A fiery political moment unfolded at a recent National Youth Convention, where Congressman Sandro Marcos delivered one of his most impassioned speeches to date — a sweeping denunciation of what he calls the “toxic tactics” used by traditional politicians. His message, aimed squarely at the country’s young leaders and first-time voters, quickly dominated national conversation and drew intense reactions across the political spectrum.
Standing before the crowd, Sandro framed his message around the event’s theme of integrity and accountability, using it as a springboard to criticize the behavior of what he termed as “fake leaders” who rely on deception, chaos, and division to advance their own agendas. Without naming specific individuals, he accused certain political actors of deliberately muddying public discourse, weaponizing misinformation, and stirring confusion for personal gain.
According to Sandro, these tactics are nothing more than the trademark moves of “traditional politics” — a style of leadership he claims the younger generation is increasingly rejecting. He warned that these figures are not interested in national unity or real solutions, but are instead focused on undermining institutions and tearing down public trust for their own political advantage.
The congressman’s message struck many as a pointed rebuke of the voices that have been critical of the current administration. Observers noted an unmistakable subtext: in defending the government’s agenda, Sandro was simultaneously drawing a line between what he sees as genuine public service and the old, conflict-driven brand of politics he blamed for sowing instability.
He emphasized that integrity — “doing what is right even when nobody is watching” — must be the benchmark for all leaders. In contrast, he said, those who manipulate narratives and intentionally mislead the public betray the values needed to move the nation forward.
Sandro also spoke about accountability, framing it not as a weapon used in political mudslinging, but as a responsibility that requires honesty, self-correction, and transparency. He argued that the individuals spreading division rarely practice accountability themselves, choosing instead to deflect blame while stoking further public tension.
Addressing the youth directly, he cast them as the generation capable of breaking the cycle. He urged them to stand with leaders who pursue unity and constructive solutions, rather than those he described as clinging to outdated, personality-driven political clashes.
Throughout his speech, Sandro positioned himself and the emerging generation of public officials as advocates for a more forward-looking brand of governance—one rooted in shared purpose rather than factional rivalry. Analysts say the address was more than a policy appeal; it was a declaration of his role in the country’s evolving political landscape.
By the time he concluded, the message was clear: the battle for the nation’s future, in his view, is now a battle between two political cultures — one driven by cooperation and integrity, and another fueled by disinformation and division. And with this speech, Sandro Marcos firmly placed himself at the center of that fight.