The Philippine political landscape is facing a turbulent shift that could redefine governance in the country. Recent reports indicate that Vice President Sara Duterte may be contemplating resignation, citing frustration and disillusionment over recent political setbacks. Sources suggest that the Vice President is distressed by the low turnout in planned protests and public demonstrations, events meant to rally opposition support but which largely failed to gain momentum. Once a symbol of political invincibility, the Duterte brand now faces signs of waning influence, with insiders claiming that the mounting pressure may drive her to step aside entirely.
Opposition Stumbles, Political Momentum Lost
The reported resignation comes in the wake of the “Marcos Resign” movement, which failed to mobilize significant support between November 16 and 18. Observers note that even influential religious organizations, including the Iglesia ni Cristo, reportedly prohibited the use of their gatherings for political protests, further weakening opposition efforts. This loss of momentum has allegedly left Vice President Duterte demoralized, fueling speculation that she may exit office to halt political friction and allow the government to stabilize.
Enter the “Military-Backed Reset”
Amid the Duterte camp’s perceived weakening, a more controversial proposal has surfaced: a so-called “Military-Backed Reset.” This plan, reportedly discussed among retired military officers and elite power brokers, envisions bypassing constitutional succession to install a non-politician billionaire as caretaker of the nation. Proponents argue that economic instability and political gridlock require the guidance of a proven corporate leader rather than traditional politicians.
At the center of these rumors is Ramon S. Ang, President and CEO of San Miguel Corporation. Advocates for this “reset” contend that a successful businessman could stabilize the peso, invigorate the economy, and manage the country with efficiency akin to running a corporation. The narrative has drawn both intrigue and alarm, with many critics warning of potential conflicts between corporate interests and public welfare.
Strong Backlash and Constitutional Concerns
Congressman Paolo “Pulong” Duterte, Sara Duterte’s brother, has publicly condemned the proposal, calling it “outright unconstitutional.” He emphasized that bypassing the Vice President in succession violates democratic norms and threatens to marginalize the Duterte family politically. Critics warn that empowering the military to dictate leadership sets a dangerous precedent and resembles a soft coup, undermining the foundations of Philippine democracy.
History also raises cautionary flags. Past controversies, such as the Coco Levy Fund, have shown how corporate influence can exploit public resources. Skeptics argue that a businessman at the helm might prioritize profit over citizens’ welfare, with environmental and social consequences, citing projects like reclamation in Bulacan as examples of corporate-driven development overriding public interest.
The Military’s Role Under Scrutiny
The concept of a “Military Reset” directly challenges the constitutional mandate that the armed forces remain neutral in political affairs. By advocating for a specific leader or governmental reconfiguration, military factions risk overstepping their mandate and threatening national stability. Experts warn that normalizing such intervention could empower armed forces and wealthy backers to manipulate governance at will.
At a Crossroads
Rumors of Vice President Duterte’s resignation and the emergence of the “Military Reset” plan highlight the Philippines’ precarious political moment. The administration faces corruption and inefficiency allegations, while opposition forces struggle to maintain relevance. Citizens are confronted with a “third option” promising stability, but at the potential cost of democratic integrity.
Public vigilance is critical. The appeal of a quick-fix solution via a tycoon or military intervention may obscure long-term threats to freedom and constitutional order. While Vice President Duterte’s personal challenges are significant, the broader stakes involve the nation’s democratic future—a potential crisis with historic consequences.