The illusion of unity within the Marcos Jr. administration has been shattered by a political bombshell circulating online. A viral report now claims that Congressman Zaldy Co, once one of the most loyal pillars of the UniTeam, has broken ranks—and brought with him what he allegedly calls “proof.”
According to the circulating story, Co has “kumanta na”—he has spoken out. And not just with words. The report alleges that he has shown a video that could upend the entire political landscape.
The footage, as described, supposedly shows large amounts of cash being transported—not to a government office, but allegedly to the private residence of President Ferdinand “BBM” Marcos Jr.
Even more striking, the same report claims that the video links Interior Secretary Boying Remulla to the same money trail.
If true, it would be the most devastating insider leak of the Marcos administration.
Why Zaldy Co’s Alleged Testimony Hits Hard
Zaldy Co is not a peripheral figure. He is a major force in the House of Representatives, especially within the powerful appropriations committee—one of the most influential bodies in government. His loyalty was a defining part of the UniTeam’s strength.
That is precisely why this alleged “leak” has caused such an uproar.
This isn’t an accusation from a rival bloc—this is a supposed confession from someone who was inside the circle.
A man who, as critics and supporters both agree, “knew how the system worked.”
The Alleged Video: A Turning Point
While the video itself has not surfaced publicly, the claims about it have already set off a nationwide political storm. According to the report, the footage is described as somewhat grainy—possibly from a hidden or handheld device—but clear enough to show the movement of cash in physical form.
And the alleged destination?
Not an office. Not an agency.
But the President’s private home.
If true, this would be a direct blow to the narrative of “clean governance” that the administration has tried to project. It removes the layer of “distance” usually used to deny involvement and instead paints a picture of personal receipt.
The alleged mention of Secretary Remulla deepens the controversy further, widening it from a personal allegation to a supposed network of coordination.
Is This Betrayal—or Survival?
Why would Zaldy Co risk political self-destruction by making such a claim?
Analysts suggest one reason: self-preservation.
Co himself has faced intense scrutiny in recent weeks, especially over questions surrounding budget insertions and confidential funds. Political observers believe he may have felt cornered—possibly positioned to take the fall should investigations escalate.
If that is the case, this “reveal” is his attempt to rewrite the narrative:
He was not the architect. He was following instructions.
He was not the mastermind. He was part of a system.
By speaking out first, he shifts the pressure upward—toward higher offices.
A Coalition in Collapse
The fallout is immediate. The once-powerful UniTeam—already strained by clashes between major factions—is now portrayed as crumbling in real time. Rumors of panic inside the Palace paint a picture of allies distancing themselves, phones ringing nonstop, and strategists scrambling for damage control.
Trust, once the backbone of the coalition, may now be irreparably broken.
The Administration’s Expected Defense
Government officials are likely to deny the accusations, branding the video as fake, manipulated, or AI-generated. They may dismiss Co as a disgruntled insider or accuse him of siding with political rivals.
But the narrative has already shifted.
Once a “supermajority,” the Marcos camp is now fighting to regain control of the storyline—while the public waits for clarifications, evidence, or statements from those involved.
What Happens Next?
Whether the video exists or not, the allegation itself has changed the political temperature of the country. It has emboldened government critics, energized the opposition, and turned Zaldy Co into the most talked-about figure in the nation.
And now, Filipinos are asking the same question:
If one ally has already “sung,” who will be the next to break their silence?